2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,748 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 1540 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2002 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 1982 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | MCC | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Crossblade | Corniche |
Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 6748 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 2280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 3030 mm |