2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1991 Acura Integra
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Acura Integra (138 HP) has 68 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Acura Integra (163 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 1991 Acura Integra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 1991 Acura Integra | |
Make | MCC | Acura |
Model | Crossblade | Integra |
Year Released | 2002 | 1991 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 163 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2560 mm |