2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1994 Renault Laguna

To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Renault Laguna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Renault Laguna would be higher. At 2,067 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Renault Laguna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Renault Laguna (114 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Renault Laguna weights approximately 505 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Renault Laguna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Renault Laguna (168 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1994 Renault Laguna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade. 1994 Renault Laguna has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2002 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Renault Laguna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: