2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1995 Honda Integra
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Honda Integra would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Honda Integra (176 HP) has 106 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Honda Integra weights approximately 459 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 1995 Honda Integra | |
| Make | MCC | Honda |
| Model | Crossblade | Integra |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 176 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1199 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2570 mm |
