2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1995 Peugeot 504
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Peugeot 504. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Peugeot 504 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Peugeot 504 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Peugeot 504 (100 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Peugeot 504 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Peugeot 504 weights approximately 430 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 1995 Peugeot 504 | |
| Make | MCC | Peugeot |
| Model | Crossblade | 504 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1971 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2750 mm |
