2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1996 Fiat Siena
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Siena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Siena would be higher. At 1,910 cc, 1996 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Siena. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Siena weights approximately 560 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Fiat Siena (200 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 1996 Fiat Siena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 1996 Fiat Siena | |
Make | MCC | Fiat |
Model | Crossblade | Siena |
Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1910 cc |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 200 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1300 kg |