2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1996 Toyota Cresta

To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Cresta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Cresta would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Cresta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Cresta (197 HP) has 127 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Cresta should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Cresta weights approximately 680 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota Cresta (255 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota Cresta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade. 1996 Toyota Cresta has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2002 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Toyota Cresta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: