2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 698 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 110 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | MCC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Crossblade | Pajero |
Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1400 mm |