2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1997 Morgan 4

To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Morgan 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Morgan 4 (112 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Morgan 4 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Morgan 4 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Morgan 4 (161 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1997 Morgan 4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications:

2002 MCC Crossblade 1997 Morgan 4
Make MCC Morgan
Model Crossblade 4
Year Released 2002 1997
Engine Size 599 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 70 HP 112 HP
Torque 102 Nm 161 Nm
Torque RPM 3210 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 740 kg 970 kg
Vehicle Length 2630 mm 4020 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1530 mm
Vehicle Height 1520 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 1810 mm 2450 mm