2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 1997 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1997 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1997 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 295 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Seat Inca Kombi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Seat Inca Kombi (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1997 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 1997 Seat Inca Kombi | |
Make | MCC | Seat |
Model | Crossblade | Inca Kombi |
Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1391 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 107 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1035 kg |