2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2000 Nissan Stagea

To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Stagea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Stagea would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Stagea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Nissan Stagea (129 HP) has 59 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Stagea should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Stagea weights approximately 690 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Nissan Stagea (175 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2000 Nissan Stagea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade. 2000 Nissan Stagea has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2002 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Nissan Stagea will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: