2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2001 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 698 cc (3 cylinders), 2001 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Smart ForTwo (74 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 80 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 2001 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | MCC | Smart |
| Model | Crossblade | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 74 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
