2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2001 Suzuki GSX R4
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Suzuki GSX R4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Suzuki GSX R4 would be higher. At 1,248 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Suzuki GSX R4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Suzuki GSX R4 (170 HP) has 100 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki GSX R4 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 100 kg more than 2001 Suzuki GSX R4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Suzuki GSX R4 (137 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2001 Suzuki GSX R4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 2001 Suzuki GSX R4 | |
| Make | MCC | Suzuki |
| Model | Crossblade | GSX R4 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1248 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 170 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2340 mm |
