2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2001 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Condor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Condor would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Condor (88 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Condor should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Condor weights approximately 620 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Condor (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2001 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 2001 Toyota Condor | |
Make | MCC | Toyota |
Model | Crossblade | Condor |
Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1812 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 88 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1360 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2610 mm |