2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (231 HP) has 161 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 1068 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Pathfinder (363 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 2004 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | MCC | Nissan |
| Model | Crossblade | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 3507 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 231 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 363 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1808 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2710 mm |
