2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2004 Riley MR II
To start off, 2004 Riley MR II is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 7,994 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Riley MR II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Riley MR II weights approximately 320 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 2004 Riley MR II | |
| Make | MCC | Riley |
| Model | Crossblade | MR II |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 7994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2650 mm |
