2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2005 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,874 cc, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP) has 147 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 1160 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 2005 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | MCC | SsangYong |
| Model | Crossblade | Rexton |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 2874 cc |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 217 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1900 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2830 mm |
