2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2005 Toyota Tacoma
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tacoma is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,688 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tacoma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tacoma (164 HP) has 94 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tacoma should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tacoma weights approximately 814 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Tacoma (250 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Tacoma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 2005 Toyota Tacoma | |
| Make | MCC | Toyota |
| Model | Crossblade | Tacoma |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 2688 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 164 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1554 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 5290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 3240 mm |
