2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2005 ZAZ Tavrija
To start off, 2005 ZAZ Tavrija is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,090 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 ZAZ Tavrija is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2005 ZAZ Tavrija. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 2005 ZAZ Tavrija. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 ZAZ Tavrija weights approximately 5 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 ZAZ Tavrija, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 2005 ZAZ Tavrija | |
Make | MCC | ZAZ |
Model | Crossblade | Tavrija |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1090 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 51 HP |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2330 mm |