2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 83 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | MCC | Holden |
Model | Crossblade | Epica |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2700 mm |