2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,986 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 972 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | MCC | Toyota |
| Model | Crossblade | Condor |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 2986 cc |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1712 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2660 mm |
