2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2009 Volvo V70

To start off, 2009 Volvo V70 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo V70 (232 HP) has 162 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade.

Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo V70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo V70 (236 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo V70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade. 2009 Volvo V70 has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2002 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo V70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: