2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2010 Chrysler 300

To start off, 2010 Chrysler 300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler 300 (360 HP) has 290 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chrysler 300 (527 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 425 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2010 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade. 2010 Chrysler 300 has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2002 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chrysler 300 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: