2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2010 Dodge Caliber
To start off, 2010 Dodge Caliber is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Caliber is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Caliber (172 HP) has 102 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Caliber should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Caliber, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Caliber (223 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Caliber will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 2010 Dodge Caliber | |
| Make | MCC | Dodge |
| Model | Crossblade | Caliber |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 172 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 223 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4415 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1748 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1534 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2634 mm |
