2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2010 Ford Taurus

To start off, 2010 Ford Taurus is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Taurus (365 HP) has 295 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Taurus weights approximately 1241 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Ford Taurus is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Taurus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Taurus (474 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 372 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade. 2010 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2002 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: