2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 91 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade. 2010 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2002 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | MCC | Holden |
Model | Crossblade | Colorado |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |