2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2011 BMW 535
To start off, 2011 BMW 535 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 BMW 535 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 BMW 535 (311 HP) has 241 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 BMW 535 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 BMW 535 (600 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 498 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2011 BMW 535 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade. 2011 BMW 535 has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2002 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 BMW 535 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 2011 BMW 535 | |
Make | MCC | BMW |
Model | Crossblade | 535 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 311 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 600 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4907 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1462 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2968 mm |