2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2011 Chevrolet Cruze
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Cruze (136 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Cruze should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Cruze (167 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 2011 Chevrolet Cruze | |
Make | MCC | Chevrolet |
Model | Crossblade | Cruze |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 136 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1796 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2685 mm |