2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2011 Citroen C3

To start off, 2011 Citroen C3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2011 Citroen C3. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 2011 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Citroen C3 weights approximately 383 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.

Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C3 (161 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2011 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications:

2002 MCC Crossblade 2011 Citroen C3
Make MCC Citroen
Model Crossblade C3
Year Released 2002 2011
Engine Size 599 cc 1398 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 70 HP 67 HP
Torque 102 Nm 161 Nm
Torque RPM 3210 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 740 kg 1123 kg
Vehicle Length 2630 mm 3870 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1520 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 1810 mm 2470 mm