2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1800 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | MCC | Fisker |
| Model | Crossblade | Karma |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 3160 mm |
