2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2012 BMW 120
To start off, 2012 BMW 120 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 BMW 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 120 (176 HP) has 106 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 120 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW 120 weights approximately 700 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 120 (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2012 BMW 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Crossblade | 2012 BMW 120 | |
Make | MCC | BMW |
Model | Crossblade | 120 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 176 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4239 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1421 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2660 mm |