2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2012 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 2012 Nissan Leaf | |
| Make | MCC | Nissan |
| Model | Crossblade | Leaf |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4445 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2700 mm |
