2002 MCC Crossblade vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (345 HP) has 275 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lotus Evora weights approximately 700 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (400 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Crossblade | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | MCC | Lotus |
| Model | Crossblade | Evora |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 345 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4361 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2575 mm |
