2002 MCC ForTwo vs. 1958 Triumph TR3
To start off, 2002 MCC ForTwo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Triumph TR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Triumph TR3 (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2002 MCC ForTwo. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Triumph TR3 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Triumph TR3 weights approximately 245 kg more than 2002 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC ForTwo | 1958 Triumph TR3 | |
Make | MCC | Triumph |
Model | ForTwo | TR3 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1958 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2240 mm |