2002 MCC ForTwo vs. 1999 Nissan SUT
To start off, 2002 MCC ForTwo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan SUT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan SUT would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan SUT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan SUT (140 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2002 MCC ForTwo. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan SUT should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC ForTwo.
Because 1999 Nissan SUT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan SUT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan SUT (372 Nm) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC ForTwo. (70 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan SUT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC ForTwo. 1999 Nissan SUT has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC ForTwo has manual transmission. 2002 MCC ForTwo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan SUT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC ForTwo | 1999 Nissan SUT | |
| Make | MCC | Nissan |
| Model | ForTwo | SUT |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 3299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
