2002 MCC ForTwo vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC ForTwo would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2002 MCC ForTwo. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC ForTwo.
Because 2002 MCC ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC ForTwo | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | MCC | Ford |
| Model | ForTwo | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2490 mm |
