2002 MCC ForTwo vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC ForTwo would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2002 MCC ForTwo. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC ForTwo.
Because 2002 MCC ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC ForTwo. (70 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC ForTwo | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | MCC | Nissan |
| Model | ForTwo | Micra |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2449 mm |
