2002 MCC ForTwo vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC ForTwo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Roadster weights approximately 575 kg more than 2002 MCC ForTwo.
Because 2002 MCC ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Roadster (279 Nm @ 5100 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC ForTwo. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC ForTwo | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | MCC | Mini |
| Model | ForTwo | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 279 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3758 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1391 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2467 mm |
