2002 MCC Smart vs. 1950 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Talbot T 26 (276 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 2002 MCC Smart. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 125 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Smart | 1950 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | MCC | Talbot |
Model | Smart | T 26 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1950 |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3430 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2510 mm |