2002 MCC Smart vs. 1955 Singer Hunter
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Singer Hunter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Smart (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1955 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1955 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Singer Hunter weights approximately 356 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Smart | 1955 Singer Hunter | |
| Make | MCC | Singer |
| Model | Smart | Hunter |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1146 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3430 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2180 mm |
