2002 MCC Smart vs. 1964 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Alpine is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Smart (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Sunbeam Alpine weights approximately 210 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Sunbeam Alpine (128 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Smart. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1964 Sunbeam Alpine will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Smart | 1964 Sunbeam Alpine | |
| Make | MCC | Sunbeam |
| Model | Smart | Alpine |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 1592 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66.5 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 67 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3430 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 40 L |
