2002 MCC Smart vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2002 MCC Smart. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 324 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Smart | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | MCC | Sunbeam |
| Model | Smart | Tiger |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3430 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 27 L |
