2002 MCC Smart vs. 1970 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercury Cougar (167 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2002 MCC Smart. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 860 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercury Cougar (363 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Smart. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1970 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Smart | 1970 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | MCC | Mercury |
| Model | Smart | Cougar |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1970 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 5769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 167 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 363 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66.5 mm | 101.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 67 mm | 88.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3430 mm | 5840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2860 mm |
