2002 MCC Smart vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 530 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart.
Because 2002 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Smart | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | MCC | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Smart | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 2259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3430 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2680 mm |
