2002 MCC Smart vs. 1996 Nissan Stagea
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Stagea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Stagea would be higher. At 2,568 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Nissan Stagea is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Nissan Stagea is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Stagea will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Nissan Stagea (362 Nm) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Smart. (110 Nm). This means 1996 Nissan Stagea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Smart | 1996 Nissan Stagea | |
Make | MCC | Nissan |
Model | Smart | Stagea |
Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 2568 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 362 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 66.5 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67 mm | 73.4 mm |
Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 244 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3430 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2730 mm |