2002 MCC Smart vs. 1997 Rover 414i

To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 414i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 414i would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Rover 414i is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Rover 414i (103 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2002 MCC Smart. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Rover 414i should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Rover 414i weights approximately 670 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Rover 414i, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Rover 414i (167 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Smart. (110 Nm). This means 1997 Rover 414i will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Smart.

Compare all specifications: