2002 MCC Smart vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Smart would be higher. At 698 cc (3 cylinders), 2002 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Smart (80 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MCC Smart weights approximately 72 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 MCC Smart (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2002 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Smart | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | MCC | MCC |
Model | Smart | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3430 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 1810 mm |