2002 MCC Smart vs. 2013 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2013 Ford Taurus is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Smart would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Taurus (284 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 2002 MCC Smart. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Taurus weights approximately 1044 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Taurus (344 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Smart. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Smart. 2013 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC Smart has manual transmission. 2002 MCC Smart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MCC Smart | 2013 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | MCC | Ford |
| Model | Smart | Taurus |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 344 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66.5 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 67 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1834 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3430 mm | 5154 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2177 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2868 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 75 L |
