2002 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1953 Riley RM A
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 230 kg more than 1953 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mercedes-Benz C has automatic transmission and 1953 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1953 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mercedes-Benz C will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mercedes-Benz C | 1953 Riley RM A | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Riley |
Model | C | RM A |
Year Released | 2002 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2870 mm |