2002 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz C (141 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 380 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz C (220 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mercedes-Benz C | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | C | Cedric |
Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2540 mm |